|
Editorial – Open Access and accessing openness |
|
Seminar.net enters it’s fourth year, and has reached a state of maturity in a number of meanings:  it receives manuscripts from all continents, the articles are read from 134 countries, of which India represents the highest number of readers, a number of articles have been read by more than 10 000 interested persons, and the frequency of issues is now three per year, and will reach four by next year. Interested parties now approach us in order to learn about our policies and practices.
It takes time to become established and influential in the sense that
articles are cited and referred to in prestigious publications. Still,
the most prestigious publications are on paper. Many countries now
embark on a policy that rewards researchers that publish in
international journals, preferably in English. National languages are
rendered less significant. In the UK, the research assessment exercise
(RAE), and several other countries with a publication or citation based
reward system in research, tend to favour quantitative dimensions at
the expense of the quality of the publication. International publishing
houses are huge profit-making companies that over years have increased
their profit rates, charging increasingly economically pressured higher
education institution with high subscription rates. With the advent of
electronic publishing their position is severely challenged. It has
been noted that the most significant publication of the last couple of
decades was an electronic publication: Tim Berners Lee published the
protocol for the World Wide Web in 1990. It was never refereed, nor was
controlled by appointed gatekeepers of the “establishment”. The number
of Open Access publications is rising every day, and the number of
e-journals for academic publishing is reaching higher and higher
numbers. In a recent case The Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Harvard
University decided, that Harvard employees must publish all their
material simultaneously on the electronic archive in their home
institution. This means they should avoid publishing in articles that
refuse parallel publishing. This is one of many encouraging events that
might pave the way for more Open Access journals.
In this issue of Seminar.net, we present four articles and a book review.
|